New Delhi (Agency): The Gyanvapi complex dispute, a long-standing legal battle concerning the area next to the Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, has taken a significant turn. Jitendra Singh Bisen, chief of the Vishwa Vedic Sanatan Sangh, a Hindu organization at the forefront of the dispute, has written an open letter advocating for an out-of-court settlement.
The timing of the letter coincides with the ongoing scientific survey of the Gyanvapi complex, as ordered by the Varanasi district court.
In the letter, Bisen invites both Hindu and Muslim sides to hold talks and settle the dispute with mutual consent. He explains that the letter has the backing of Rakhi Singh, the main litigant in the case from the Hindu side. Bisen stated, “If this matter can be resolved by mutual consent, then nothing can be better than that.”
The letter also warns against anti-social elements who might exploit the constitutional fight between Hindus and Muslims for personal gain, potentially harming both the country and society. Bisen emphasizes the importance of setting an example by resolving the dispute peacefully through dialogue, considering the safety and security of the country and society. “It is possible that a peaceful solution can be found outside the court in the above matter by mutual discussion. We welcome all of you to this dialogue with an open and pure heart,” the letter reads.
The Joint Secretary of the Intezamia Masjid Committee, Mohammad Yasin, confirmed that the committee received the letter and will deliberate on it in a meeting. “Whatever decision will be taken by the members of the committee will be valid,” Yasin said.
However, not all parties involved appear to be in favor of a peaceful dialogue. Hai Shankar Jain, counsel for other Hindu litigants, stated firmly, “I want to say clearly that Sanatan Dharmi will not compromise on an inch of Bholenath in Kashi, it is possible that Muslims should apologize and remove their illegal occupation.”
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has also weighed in on the matter, suggesting that the Muslim community should admit to “a historic mistake” that occurred at the site and propose a “solution.”
The Gyanvapi complex dispute has been a contentious issue with deep historical and cultural significance. The proposed out-of-court settlement, though a significant step, is likely to be fraught with challenges. The situation requires careful handling, keeping in mind the sensitivities of both communities involved.
The open letter and the reactions it has received highlight the complexities of the case and the broader issues of religious harmony and legal resolution in India. It remains to be seen how the various stakeholders will respond to the proposal and whether a peaceful solution can be reached through dialogue and mutual understanding.
