Raipur (Agency): Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel has urged Union Home Minister Amit Shah to ban the movie “Adipurush,” which has drawn criticism for its dialogues, colloquial language, and portrayal of characters from the epic Ramayana. Amit Shah arrived in Raipur, the state capital, on Thursday afternoon and is scheduled to address a public rally in the neighboring city of Durg.
In a tweet, Chief Minister Baghel welcomed Amit Shah to the land associated with Lord Ram and humbly requested him to announce the banning of the film #Adipurush, which Baghel believes tarnishes the image of the Ramayana and its deities. Baghel had previously expressed concerns about the movie and hinted that the Chhattisgarh Congress government might consider a ban if demanded by the people.
The Chief Minister alleged that certain dialogues in the film are objectionable and indecent, and questioned the silence of political parties that claim to be guardians of religion, implicitly referring to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). “Adipurush,” featuring Prabhas in the lead role, presents a modern retelling of the epic Ramayana and was released last Friday.
Amit Shah’s arrival in Raipur was greeted by former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh, state BJP President Arun Sao, and other senior leaders. Shah is expected to address a public meeting at the Ravi Shankar Stadium in Durg, where he will highlight the achievements of the nine-year tenure of the Narendra Modi-led central government as part of the BJP’s ‘Maha Jansampark Abhiyan’ (mass contact campaign).
Prior to the rally, Amit Shah will visit the residence of renowned Pandwani singer and Padma Shri awardee Usha Barle. The purpose of Shah’s visit is to connect with the people and showcase the progress made under the central government’s leadership.
As the controversy surrounding “Adipurush” escalates, the request for a ban by Chief Minister Baghel adds a new dimension to the ongoing debate. The film has sparked discussions about creative freedom, cultural representation, and religious sentiments. The decision on whether or not to ban the movie will likely generate further dialogue on the boundaries of artistic expression and the preservation of religious heritage.
