Supreme Court Suggests Psychological Evaluation for Convicts Seeking Early Release

The Indian Supreme Court recommends that government authorities consider psychological reports when evaluating applications for the premature release of convicts.

Supreme Court of India

New Delhi (Agency): In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India has opined that the government may benefit from reports by qualified psychologists when considering the early release of convicts. This suggestion is part of the court’s broader advice that the Remission Board consider multiple aspects, including post-prison behavior, remissions earned, age, health condition, and family circumstances.

The court’s recommendation came during the review of a petition filed by a man convicted of murder, identified as Rajo alias Rajwa alias Rajendra Mandal. The man has been in custody for 24 years and was seeking premature release on the grounds of having completed mandatory prison time and showing good conduct.

“In this court’s considered view, it would also serve the ends of justice if the appropriate government had the benefit of a report contemporaneously prepared by a qualified psychologist after interacting/interviewing the convict that has applied for premature release,” the court said in its August 25th order.

The top court further emphasized that the Remission Board should not solely rely on the presiding judge or police reports. This is particularly true in cases where the victims were police personnel, as personal biases could affect the decision-making process. The court noted that such biases “cannot be given determinative value” and could misguide the government.

Additionally, the court warned against adopting a “stereotypical approach” that limits the chances for premature release. Such an approach, the court said, could defeat the purpose of rehabilitation and lead to despair and frustration among inmates who might consider themselves reformed.

The court also suggested other factors that the government should consider. These include the potential for the convict to commit future crimes, the socio-economic conditions, familial relationships, and the possibility of reintegration into society. Educational qualifications acquired while in custody, volunteer services offered, and engagement in socially beneficial activities should also be considered for a comprehensive evaluation.

Exit mobile version